Nearly everyday now, a new video surfaces proving why I believe hitting women in self-defense needs to become 100% normal and accepted in Western society. (scroll down for video)
You’d think in this post-feminist age of “gender equality” that the notion of a man defending himself against a violent woman would be totally acceptable—but it’s not.
Quite the contrary: even the most violent, aggressive women are often excused of their actions after assaulting innocent men (see: Ray Rice Incident). Even worse: men still bear the burden of responsibility—socially and legally—because society and justice systems tend to view women as default damsel-victims.
A recent video has surfaced on YouTube which purports to have been shot in Waldorf, Maryland, showing a hostile woman assaulting a man and damaging his vehicle. The male is clearly attempting to neutralize the situation/prevent it from escalating as he consistently backs up/dodges the woman’s attacks, until finally, he snaps.
As you will see in the video below, the man’s hesitation to defend himself exemplifies why I firmly believe hitting women in self-defense needs to become 100% normal and accepted in Western society. If this woman had instead been a man, do you think the male in this video would have allowed “her” to punch him and damage his car without retaliating?
The truth is: because society condemns hitting women in self-defense (under the “sexist” notion women are generally weaker than men), this man had to allow a rambunctious, violent, aggressive, destructive woman to get away with damaging body and property for far longer than if “she” had been a “he”.
Is this what women’s liberation is all about? Allowing women to get away with destroying things because “women are weaker and men shouldn’t hit them”?
Watch the video for yourself: