A video posted to YouTube depicts a violent woman trespassing onto a man’s driveway, assaulting him, and refusing to leave even after multiple requests. (scroll down for video)
One of the great conveniences feminism affords women is the ability to claim equality to men when it benefits them, yet revert to a 1950’s damsel in distress when things get too tough.
Wanna be paid the same as men (even though you don’t work as hard/perform the same functions)? No problem!
Wanna get away with assaulting men under the presumption “men shouldn’t hit women” because women are “weaker”? Feminism’s got ya covered!
Some (not sure the exact number) women today have a complete disrespect for men’s inherent strength advantage over them. They use feminism’s “I don’t need no man!” mantra as the rationalization for attacking men, but if that man ever DARES defend himself, she’s quick to break down in tears, indignant to what could none other be described as a taste of gender equality.
And while the average woman enjoys unwarranted empowerment through the neutering of men, men are unjustly DISEMPOWERED because they deliberately restrain their general physical strength advantage over women because “men shouldn’t hit women.” It’s a tyranny of mediocrity—one of the greatest social diseases crippling humanity today.
And this is most certainly the case in this video. Although the events leading up to the exchange are unknown, it seems pretty easy to tell who the more unnecessarily-aggressive person is, and who was trying to neutralize the situation. (scroll down for video)
I’ll just let you watch the full video, but ask yourself this question: do you think the male property-owner would have been as patient if the trespasser was male instead of female?
And then ask yourself this: do you think the woman was more inclined to assault him because she knew most men won’t hit women under the notion “men shouldn’t hit women”?
Decide for yourself: